Standing in line to get into the City Council chamber, you could feel that things were going to go wrong. I was in conversation from a cameraman from 2-cent when voices rose behind us. An older black woman and a younger black man shouted at a well-dressed, middle-aged white woman."Get off my back!"
"What are you doing here!"
"What are you doing here!"
The addressed feigned calm, saying that her adversaries had tried to cut in line. This didn't calm things. The cameraman and I passed through the metal detector, agreeing that today would be crazy.
I take a seat in the last row, and that well dressed woman and her three friends sit down in front of me, the friends offering congratulations on the woman's cool response. To my right and left are empty seats, with two black ladies on the left after that. This quickly becomes important as a group of self-proclaimed "residents" begins to shout that there are seats available, and "let them in!" When a cop asks one woman to sit down, she tells him, "I'm not a slave," and continues that line for a few minutes.
Things don't improve, the tension aided in large part by the cluster of cameras stuck in the face of these residents, who stand and begin to shout into the lenses as the media's face remains unimpressed, recording.
"What about the people?! What about the people!?" demands the young guy from the argument outside. He goes into a loud rant as the spotlights hit him, and another young man does the same, as do several others, each of them the focus of one or more cameras."This is a YouTube riot," I tell the woman next to me, and we both keep asking why the cops don't get those "media" people out of the aisles, as they're obviously the ones keeping this thing hot.
Here, I think, is how history gets played out today, how the record is made of anger--through the shouts of the dispossessed as captured by the ambivalent handheld camera. I remember in the 2000 RNC riots in Philadelphia, there was a protest crew that called itself "Camcorder Jihad." This afternoon's digital crew is more limp, but perhaps more malignant.
Some tall kid waves a red-black-green bandana, and the chant of "What About The People?" rises up again. The cops and some senior organizers get things to briefly calm down, though the young guy from outside warns everyone that things are "gonna go down" if more people aren't let in by 10:35. Again, I concur with the woman next to me that there should've been some kind of plan on the part of the council for this thing; everyone knew this would be hot. We note the time, and she tells me that the council had a reception upstairs for Jackie Clarkson's swearing in. Great timing, that.
Finally, Cynthia Hedge-Morrell emerges. The boos start, and one of the "residents" shouts, "Let the record show that the sell-out came out first." Cries of "house Negro" can be heard. Hedge-Morrell gets up and walks off. After another 5 minutes, she and the rest of the members begin to file onto the platform and the boos and slurs build. Stacey Head is called a "devil," and she does something extremely stupid in response.
Stacey Head turns to the loud section, smiles, and blows a kiss. Offensive when it happened, this becomes more disgusting in light of what follows.
As Fielkow tries to call for "security, security," the crowd gets louder. Cops amass in front of the audience in the middle section, and all of a sudden, pushing and screaming breaks out. People from the "residents" group in front of us on the left join the scrum, the spotlights spin and bob, and the video screen shows groups of hands on the backs of cops, that is until someone asks for the video to be cut. The four women in front of us get down on the ground like they're in a war zone, and the woman next to me and I laugh at their weird training. This goes on for at least 3 or 4 minutes, during which the entire council save for one disappears into the rear.
As Fielkow tries to call for "security, security," the crowd gets louder. Cops amass in front of the audience in the middle section, and all of a sudden, pushing and screaming breaks out. People from the "residents" group in front of us on the left join the scrum, the spotlights spin and bob, and the video screen shows groups of hands on the backs of cops, that is until someone asks for the video to be cut. The four women in front of us get down on the ground like they're in a war zone, and the woman next to me and I laugh at their weird training. This goes on for at least 3 or 4 minutes, during which the entire council save for one disappears into the rear.James Carter remains on the platform, calling over and over into the microphone, "Calm down, calm down." He looks alone, sad, stuck.
Protesters are escorted out by cops, but the woman who called out Hedge-Morell, the same one who wouldn't be treated like "a slave," won't settle down. The cops surround her as she yells from her seat. Finally, they make a move to arrest her. She begins to squeal and curse them, but they succeed in lifting her by her ankles and wrists. Still, she fights. Finally they lay her down and I can see the taser in the hand of one cop.
"Don't do me like that! Don't me do me like that!" the woman hisses. They don't, but get her upright and pull her out on her feet. She spits on the floor, calls them all cowards, and disappears out the door.
Things do calm down, and Fielkow calls order. We pray for the city's safety, do the pledge of allegiance, then listen to the National Anthem while a montage of American and New Orleans images plays on the video screen.
As the clerk reads the rules, I get up and leave. Outside in the lobby, an elderly woman in a wheel chair is attended to by EMS. A crowd on the other side of a fence cries, "Let Us In!" I walk out through a back gate manned by a cop. The rain is warm, falling on the reserved buildings of the CBD, where business goes on in silent earnest.
And now I have to go to a holiday lunch for work, where I plan on getting good and drunk.
That is what we Irish do after a funeral.
Because something died in there today, and something ugly came to pass.
16 comments:
Thanks for posting this.
I kind of feel like drinking, too, but I think I'm going to call / email each of the council members, and try to rally as many people as I can find to do the same.
Agitators arrived from out of town intent on turning a difficult issue into a circus-like WTO event, intent on making a point about creating a revolution, not helping people. The poor of New Orleans aren't served by these people creating scenes of chaos, but by engaging in meaningful, compelling dialog. It's a total disgrace that extremists on both sides of this issue have hijacked the process with stereotypes, rather than allowing moderate voices to speak and arrive at consensus.
There's something sinister in all of this, but beyond that, a real sadness. After they'd cleared out the rancoteurs and the anthem ended, you could feel the shame. Another wasted moment in New Orleans post-Katrina.
I attend every Council meeting as part of the work I do. I was locked out with the crowd who was teargassed.
A different interpretation of Stacy Head's action requires an understanding of the sequence of events:
http://peoplegetready.jockamofeenanay.com/?p=1844#comments
Who instigated the incivility? How have public housing residents themselves been prevented from speaking, consensus building, and progress, because of the agitators fomenting violence and disruption of a civic process.
Don't like the results? Vote.
Getting locked out of proceedings isn't a violation of public meetings laws, or democracy -- in particular when the goal of those who seek entry isn't dialog, but disruption of the proceedings.
Schroeder: I'm with you on the outside faux-radicals mixing up the message. I watched an organizer creep up to Ses-45 and whisper in his ear and it creeped me the fuck out. These residents are being used, and in the end, this might mean they lose everything faster than if they'd built a consensus, a plan, a protest in their own voice. I've been hesitant to take a side in this because 1. I can't stomach supporting the return of the conditions in those projects, it feels defeatist; and 2. I have no way of knowing what the majority of former residents want, and can't imagine speaking on their behalf, well-intentioned or no.
As someone who's been in mass demonstrations, I was embarassed--here is a group that has a legitimate beef, turned into raging idiots by someone else's rhetoric. The fact that Head couldn't play it cool, couldn't think of public service instead of pride in the heat of the moment, that's a bad, bad sign.
I was not there to disrupt or cause trouble. I was there to enter My City Hall. To be locked out is an offense.
Karen, don't you think it's a little disingenuous to suggest that you were locked out when you have other ways of making your views known? You were denied entry because it's kind of difficult to sort out the troublemakers from those who are interested in having a civil conversation, or at the very least, who had a real reason to want to say something about who they are and what they're feeling because they speak from experience.
I sent an email to Council members -- and they do read them -- which you know. You also should have known that it was going to be a circus, and that if you wanted to watch the proceedings, they were going to be carried live by the press.
It was people like Jay Arena who showed up with a bullhorn who would have served the process better by getting out of the way and letting actual residents speak their minds.
Ironically, I listened online all day, and the comments made were impassioned, but made with decency and respect, thanks to Arnie Fielkow preventing the proceedings from being hijacked. It probably wouldn't have mattered what was said -- everyone's minds were already made, because they've all been working very hard on the issue. Unfortunately, they haven't revealed what that thought process has been. Therein lies part of the problem of perception. At least as far as I can tell, for residents of Lafitte, there was a charrette process to allow resident input into the plans. Whether that was meaningful or not, I don't know, but it merits attention.
For the record, I suggested to the Council that they table the vote today, and opt for a conference on poverty and affordable housing issues, to provide an opportunity for education, breaking down stereotypes, further discussion, and consensus building.
No, I do not consider my comment to be disingenuous, rather a statement of fact. I did not go there to speak, I went to listen and observe.
I listened and observed perhaps better at a distance, monitoring live television coverage. I think it's a cheap shot to use a statement of fact in the manner you did, to imply that universal access to Council chambers is a basic right.
What died today was an ill-begotten concept that has lasted for 60 years or so. A mindset was created, and then perpetuated itself through generations. It was badly managed.
At least there will not be a total demolition of the Big 4. There will be phasing, not as much as should be, but there is some of that in there.
I just want to actually see hardcopy on the plans for the Bricks outside of Lafitte.
Tonight, sleep will not come easy.
While I agree that redevelopment and change are needed when it comes to subsidized housing in this city, I feel the council's decision was a poor attempt at "splitting the baby". I wrote to several council members urging them to issue a 60-day moratorium just to get up to speed on all the issues and give themselves a chance to figure out what ALL of their constituents need(they could have used a good week trying to understand the financing structure for these projects). In actuality they really got nothing, because development plans only work if there's money and the political will to realize them, and none of the proposals have those things fully in place.
I'm sure most of the outsiders were taking part out of solidarity. The ones that weren't there as a result of this specific issue were most likely protesting the larger issues from which this specific situation results.
The real problem with the outsiders of both types is the way protesters are handled by the media. Since the civil rights movement of the '50s/'60s, protests have been effectively castrated by the powers that be. They're often either tolerated (give them just enough room to feel like they're making a difference), manipulated for the purpose of smearing the cause, or ignored altogether.
Really, where people stand on this issue comes down to perspectives on gentrification. That's pretty much what this decision is, only with some added corruption and dishonesty on the part of HUD and such.
An effective course of action (in the interests of the lower class) would be to fix up the 4,500 homes, using lower class NOLA citizens as a significant portion of the contractors (or at least locally-owned and operated firms), and reopen them for those most in need.
Frankly, the majority of the middle class has enough economic power to handle their own, and the upper class neither necessitate nor deserve any consideration in the matter.
And for the record, it is the right of citizens to attend council meetings in their own cities. When decisions regarding the people are taking place, the people are at least as important as any city council, and much more so than any upper class business interests.
In defense of Karen, her presence at council means a whole lot more than any email she could write. I go infrequently to these things, and I have seen Stacey blow a kiss off before (not at a council meeting but an offshoot), and sometimes I imagine the pale Fielkow getting paler as I walk in the door. It's a small town, and so the insult of locking certain people out is a big one. Just as the gesture of a kiss off when you are in the power position is an insult.
To the larger issue, I find it incredulous that up to $400,000 is expected to be spent on each apartment when renovating shotguns along, say, Bienville, surely could have been done for $150,000 apiece. To me the proportions of government waste are the issue, and as such I don't see outside agitators, being we are subject to the same federal government. Neither will the Republican advocates for a smaller government ever truly give up some of these demolition/rebuild cycles for the welfare crowd; the real handouts go to politically-affiliated corporations.
To set up (as the media did) an argument predicated on TV ownership is to protect against some "emperor has no clothes" type fool saying, give the poor $150,000 houses (it's no coincidence an entertainer can get away with such an idea whereas a lawyer advocate would be villified) and spend the rest of the funding on America's infrastructure. Why again is the government throwing away salvageable housing stock to build anew, when the aging infrastructure remains in decay? Has anyone in Washington ever heard of Europe, where housing stock from the 1940s is still considered worthy of habitation, or have we become such a throwaway society that everything goes to clearance eventually?
Mind you, I'm not at all advocating these buildings necessarily be kept to warehouse the poor. It would seem these days the rich like to be warehoused - that is what the push for condos exemplified, after all, less square footage for three times the price - while a movement towards separate or row housing is advocated for those on assistance. The rich also like to be separated from the rest of society, and they do like their drugs in certain professional quarters, so perhaps the gentrification plans need only a bit of tweaking to satisfy everyone in town and beyond.
black mold exposureblack mold symptoms of exposurewrought iron garden gatesiron garden gates find them herefine thin hair hairstylessearch hair styles for fine thin hairnight vision binocularsbuy night vision binocularslipitor reactionslipitor allergic reactionsluxury beach resort in the philippines
afordable beach resorts in the philippineshomeopathy for eczema.baby eczema.save big with great mineral makeup bargainsmineral makeup wholesalersprodam iphone Apple prodam iphone prahacect iphone manualmanual for P 168 iphonefero 52 binocularsnight vision Fero 52 binocularsThe best night vision binoculars here
night vision binoculars bargainsfree photo albums computer programsfree software to make photo albumsfree tax formsprintable tax forms for free craftmatic air bedcraftmatic air bed adjustable info hereboyd air bedboyd night air bed lowest pricefind air beds in wisconsinbest air beds in wisconsincloud air beds
best cloud inflatable air bedssealy air beds portableportables air bedsrv luggage racksaluminum made rv luggage racksair bed raisedbest form raised air bedsaircraft support equipmentsbest support equipments for aircraftsbed air informercialsbest informercials bed airmattress sized air beds
bestair bed mattress antique doorknobsantique doorknob identification tipsdvd player troubleshootingtroubleshooting with the dvd playerflat panel television lcd vs plasmaflat panel lcd television versus plasma pic the bestThe causes of economic recessionwhat are the causes of economic recessionadjustable bed air foam The best bed air foam
hoof prints antique equestrian printsantique hoof prints equestrian printsBuy air bedadjustablebuy the best adjustable air bedsair beds canadian storesCanadian stores for air beds
migraine causemigraine treatments floridaflorida headache clinicdrying dessicantair drying dessicantdessicant air dryerpediatric asthmaasthma specialistasthma children specialistcarpet cleaning dallas txcarpet cleaners dallascarpet cleaning dallas
vero beach vacationvero beach vacationsbeach vacation homes veroms beach vacationsms beach vacationms beach condosmaui beach vacationmaui beach vacationsmaui beach clubbeach vacationsyour beach vacationscheap beach vacations
bob hairstylebob haircutsbob layeredpob hairstylebobbedclassic bobCare for Curly HairTips for Curly Haircurly hair12r 22.5 best pricetires truck bustires 12r 22.5
washington new housenew house houstonnew house san antonionew house venturanew houston house houston house txstains removal dyestains removal clothesstains removalteeth whiteningteeth whiteningbright teeth
Wow, how does that last comment get throught comment moderation?
Stephano the Mortgage Broker
Post a Comment